Still planning the next session, and I may have to go off to the bank and the library(I got a new three in one highlighter from my mom because my old one ran out) so well, does your wank hang low?:

Anyone who was offended by that image needs to take a de-sensitivity class. I’m just wondering (off topic) if there ever was a time when people where allowed to be non-politically-correct, to say what they think even it’s wrong, and not wonder if someone will punch them for it?

Someone who cannot differentiate the subtleties between communication with words and communication with fists is a lower life form. Screech your opinion at a monkey and it can only fling poo back at you. The pope flings words, and muslim extremists promise physical retaliation.

Back on topic, there is no greater symbol of oppression than a woman wearing a tent. I refuse to call it anything else - even directly to a muslims’s face. A nun’s habit is expressing voluntary submission to religious beliefs and tradition. A tent is simply oppression of womanhood at it’s worst, which is want Althouse et al were exemplifing in their original critism of the woman’s curvature -making issues with where none existed. Therefore, using the tent in your picture was entirely appropiate and needs no apology.

You played into their hands Amanda. You admited you were wrong, even when you were right.

It is one thing to respect someone else’s belief system when the expression of that respect has no self-limiting consequences, but it is entirely a different catagory of self-inflicted oppression when an expression of outward directed respect results in personal limitations of self. In other words, why the hell should a British shop owner stop selling piggy banks just because a muslum doesn’t like pork? I’m off topic again, ah well.

Oh Amanda, you are still super cool in my book, keep on truckin’!

Also, for extra fun, the LJ group oreos is up to their old hijinks again.